From an English perspective, it has been a hugely encouraging Six Nations: the team improved with every performance, won four out of five games, were narrowly [and somewhat controversially] beaten in the single game they lost and finished with a resounding thumping of a team who have had their number in recent years.
There are so many negatives to dwell on from an Irish perspective:
- the failure to beat anybody but the bottom two teams in the table, who managed one win between them out of ten fixtures;
- the ridiculously conservative/loyal selection;
- two appalling second-half collapses away from home [0-11 in Paris and 3-21 in Twickenham];
- the worst Six Nations record since 2008, the last year of Eddie O’Sullivan’s tenure;
- the failure to protect a six point lead for the last five minutes against Wales at home [losing that game required conceding more than a point a minute for the rest of the game, which was unfortunately achieved];
- the inability to score a single point in the second half of the French game; and finally,
- the absolute collapse of the house of cards that is the Irish scrum in yesterday’s game at Twickenham, and the resultant second-half rout.
A decade of Six Nations results will tell you that Italy are a tough enough game at home but pretty appalling away from Rome; Saturday’s performance will tell you that Scotland are simply abject. Home wins over those two teams? The Mole is reticent to be cast in the ‘demanding fan’ role, but you’d imagine that those in positions of authority at the IRFU consider those games as bankers, must-wins.
He Who Dares, Rodders
The Six Nations was a triumph for relatively daring, innovative coaches [Gatland and Lancaster] and a trying course for staid, conservative ones [Kidney and Saint-André].
Kidney ‘gambled’ on keeping together a team that had done reasonably well in RWC11 [they were very poor against the US Eagles in the first game and patchy in the quarter-final against Wales] in order to milk one more big tournament from them and in the end failed … and failed abjectly.
A Case For The Defense
In the coach’s defense, you have to take into account that they were forced to play four tests in a row against reasonable opposition because of a ludicrous logistical snafu, and that they suffered the loss of their captain mid-tournament. Brian O’Driscoll’s absence is mentioned in the same breath as Paul O’Connell all the time, but all the players involved in the Irish squad knew that he wouldn’t be a factor from four months before the tournament kicked off. While they missed the leadership, his absence was ‘a known known’ [to quote old Rummy].
In terms of yesterday’s result, with specific reference to the huge toll exacted from Tom Court’s scrummaging, who else was there to pick as substitute prop? Who has been banging down the door for selection as a prop who can play both sides? Arguably Ronan Loughney of Connacht has done enough at tighthead [having played most of his career at loosehead] to deserve some more recognition, but he has had some seriously tough days in the No3 jersey in the HEC this season, and is nowhere near Court’s standard as a loosehead.
I Tire Of This Farce … Throw Some More Christians On The Fire
That’s probably enough defending Declan Kidney, or at least making a case for his defense. In The Mole’s opinion, it has been a poor campaign for him as a coach.
What has been achieved? Two home wins against opposition who were begging to be beaten. What hasn’t been achieved?
For The Mole, this has been the key issue of the tournament: what hasn’t been done. Whether or not you believe in a ‘four year World Cup cycle’, the fact that the World Cup is there on the calendar isn’t going to change. If you’re not going to change players for the sake of form, i.e. how they’re currently playing, and you’re not going to change players for the sake of building a team, i.e. how they could play in the future, when are you going to change players?
The same player has been selected every game at Nos. 15, 14, 12, 11, 10, 8, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1 … Kidney has only started 19 players in five games. McFadden started at No13 for one game [because there was an illness in Keith Earls’ family, Earls having been initially named in the starting VX]; Reddan started at scrum-half for the two games after Conor Murray injured his knee; Peter O’Mahony started @ No7 for the game against Scotland when Sean O’Brien was in hospital with colitis; and Donnacha Ryan started @ No5 for two games when Paul O’Connell was ruled out for six weeks with a knee injury. There’s every possibility, given the rest of the selections, that if none of these illnesses or injuries had occurred, the same XV would have taken the field in all four games … despite four of them being played in 23 days.
The ‘teacher’s pet’ syndrome is more entrenched now than ever it was under the much-maligned Eddie O’Sullivan. With two wins from five [and both of those achieved at home, against teams who were battling each other in the last game for the wooden spoon], sticking with the same squad is a very, very poor return.
The unfortunate truth is that there’s no other way of looking at this Six Nations than as a waste. What was achieved? A good finish in the table? No. A good series of wins? No. A big victory over a team who had our number? No. Giving starts to a new generation of players? No.
Excellent stuff as always. I’ve one question. Eddie O’Sullivan resigned four days after ending the 2008 Six Nations with a similar pasting at Twickenham. Do you think Declan Kidney is even considering doing the same?
England and Ireland had fairly similar World Cup campaigns on the pitch. Obviously the antics of the English players off the pitch (while still representing their country) contributed to the media storm that eventually denuded that particular set-up, and paved the way for Lancaster, Farrell Snr/Jnr, etc.
Was Ireland’s tactic to change absolutely nothing down to the absence of such a caustic media culture, the Ireland players’ collective good manners… or what?
I know England have a bigger talent pool than us, I know there were a lot more positions up for grabs in their squad post-RWC, and I recognise that most Ireland players had mixed, rather than poor, campaigns… but is there another top 8 team in the world that would endure the patchiness we saw from the likes of D’Arcy, Trimble, O’Callaghan and Murray without their places in the team being even remotely threatened?
Or who would turn to O’Leary as a bench option, who hasn’t shown anything close to good form for almost 2 years now?
Or who would COMPLETELY overlook the emergence/serious improvement of players like Zebo, O’Malley, Marshall and Toner?
Or who would go into EVERY match knowing perfectly well that if a certain player got injured for a significant period (Ross), they would almost certainly lose.
In the end, this uber-conservative mindset has been more of a risk than gambling on youth ever could have been. The set-up has no way of defending itself. No result or performance that can vindicate its approach. There’s nothing experimental, or developmental, or that ‘will come good’ in the side.
Only the injuries to BOD, POC and Murray give them something to hide behind, but as we’ve said, it’s a tin enough veil.